Where’s La Rye’s Proof? (Reposted)

Over the last few days, La Rye Silvis Avila Larry Sinclair the thrice convicted felon and man who has been arrested or had warrants issued in EVERY state in which he has lived- has managed to shift the focus on his blog from “Making Noise” and “getting the story out” to one of attacking the innocent and developing bizarre conspiracy theories that make those of the tinfoil hat / black helicopter ilk seem downright sane. But here’s the rub — even unlike the tinfoil hat people, Larry does not believe his conspiracy theories; he is an oldtime con artist and fabricating the conspiracies is central to this — the con of his life . 

To borrow a favorite from one of our favorites (yes….Gumby) Larry, Moma, et. al….

Where’s the beef?

Larry’s story is fraught with inconsistencies and lies.  Here are a few of the major questions he has yet to answer because he cannot!

The Hotel

Larry has no “proof” that he (let alone Obama, let alone Obama with Larry) was ever in Gurnee in any time, including November 1999.  At the time he posted the ridiculous “points” awards from the “legal department” of Choice Hotels, we called said legal department and were told by a member of their legal staff that the information they had provided Larry proved nothing.  

The ONLY receipts that would remotely suggest Larry was there were at the actual hotel Larry allegedly stayed in.  Contacting that hotel, we quickly discovered the “receipts” were archived and would not be accessed.  If I were Larry Sinclair, I would have traveled there MONTHS ago to dig through those archives myself.  Why hasn’t he?  

THEY DO NOT EXIST.

 

The Driver

Back in the early days….Larry Sinclair posted the following on January 23, 2008, concerning the “limo driver”:

“larrysinclair0926 (4 hours ago) Show Hide Marked as spam
Reply | Spam
I flew on on Delta On 11/3/99. I am GP Member with Choice Hotels, Hilton Honors Silver with Hilton, and Priority Club Platinum with IC Hotels Group. I am going on rense dot com sat radio this evening. The driver has been scared to death by your threats, I on the other hand can not care less. “

Months ago…we wrote the following reply to his comment:

HOW THE HELL COULD THE DRIVER BE SCARED TO DEATH BY THREATS WHEN LAR-TARD ASS-PIPE HAD NOT RELEASED THE NAME?

The non-existent DRIVER has been a source of constantly changing stories, inner-fighting among the Lartardians (he lost Victor his best ally over this lie) and the NUMBER ONE PIECE OF EVIDENCE THAT LARRY SINCLAIR IS LYING.

Larry lied in his “Press Conference” and even on his “Press Statement” where he is quoted saying:

“On November 6, 1999,  I asked the limo driver – whose name I now reveal for the first time – Paramjit Multani”.

We have revealed this same “driver” numerous times, Larry allegedly gave it to Pulitzer Prize Winner John Crewdson, one of this country’s best investigative reporters, who could not VERIFY anything he had been “fed” by Sinclair.  In fact, when we contacted Crewdson (who Larry often claims has verified “everything”) we received an email stating this:

“While I am reluctant to talk about reporting that I’ve done, you can be sure that if we had ‘verified’ Mr. Sinclair’s story we certainly would have published it. I hope that answers your question. Jc”.  

Even CITIZEN WELLS….an who continues his misguided support of Sinclair has exposed Multani long before Larry “revealed it for the first time”.  On March 26 Wells writes:  

“Larry Sinclair has made allegations that he had multiple encounters with Barack Obama from November 3 through November 8 1999. One of the encounters was alleged to be in a limousine from 5 Star Limousine Service in Chicago. Sinclair states that the limousine driver’s name is P Multani. Sinclair has also stated that in the [...]  

Early on, Larry claimed the “driver” was merely waiting for “security” before he came forward with his corroboration of Larry’s story.  Days passed, then weeks, now months.  Still, no driver.

For more on the fictional “driver”…read here:

http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com/la-ryes-elusive-driver/

Why is it so difficult for Larry to produce even a sworn statement from the “driver”?  John Crewdson could not find him.  Blair Sibley NEVER communicated with him.  NO ONE has EVER HEARD FROM THE DRIVER!  Why?

HE DOESN’T EXIST!

 

Contacting the Obama Campaign Prior to the Video

Larry has claimed that for months prior to contacting the Obama campaign, he mailed numerous letter to the Obama campaign, David Axelrod and others, asking the Senator to:

“Correct the statement of his drug use when he claimed it was limited to his teenage years.”

Anyone with this “explosive” information about a leading Presidential candidate would have records or receipts of “certified” or “registered” mail and the signatures of those who signed for it.

While Sinclair “claims” these letters were written and sent, he has YET to provide proof that this was actually done.  Why?

BECAUSE HE DID NOT DO IT!  THEY DO NOT EXIST!

 

Donald Young

Larry’s entire “reason” for the first You Tube video was based on him “not getting a response from the Obama campaign” to his alleged letters.  He expressed his frustration on numerous times; frustrated and concerned because “no one in the Obama camp” had “EVER MADE CONTACT WITH HIM”.

However, after learning of Donald Young’s murder on Christmas of last year, Sinclair suddenly reports that indeed a representative of the “Obama Campaign” HAD contacted him.  He claimed it was “Donald Young”.

We believe Larry first heard of Donald Young in an interview with Lynn Thomas, who has operated a blog called “Cao’s Blog” or “Cow’s Blog”.

In an interview with Larry, she states she:

“hope you (Larry) don’t end up like Donald Young.”

It was ONLY AFTER that interview did Larry EVER mention Donald Young.  He also claimed Young contacted him “representing the Obama campaign” which completely flies in the face of EVERYTHING he had claimed before.

Even after REPEATED mentions of “DONALD YOUNG” and finally contacting the Chicago Police department with his “EARTH SHATTERING REVELATIONS” did Larry finally write this:

It will be up to the Chicago Police Department under the guidance of Jody Weis (above) to determine if the person contacting me was Donald Young and if the numbers the contact came from were numbers associated with Barack Obama.

Suddenly, when time to involve the “big boys”, Little Larry wasn’t quite so positive about ANYTHING he had said before.

If Larry is so proficient to “photo” an alleged call from a “Piano Store” why would he not have his own records about the “calls” from Donald Young.  Why would he yet to provide “proof” that he had EVER been contacted by ANYONE?  Why?

NO ONE EVER CONTACTED LARRY SINCLAIR

 

Larry’s Criminal Past

On March 11, 2008, Larry Sinclair wrote the following in his blog: 

ADDED BY LARRY:Then you are not looking at or listening to the fact. I disclosed everything about myself from the beginning, and you have just shown your own inability to be factual, because there is no scam investigations or convictions and not a single human smuggling conviction or charge. But hey I would expect nothing less from an Obama supporter since you people have been the ones putting all these claims of my past out there. LS

In EVERY interview with the true fringe people who will interview him (Opie and Anthony excluded) Larry has claimed he was always open and honest about his entire criminal history.

He also has written, stated and re-stated that his criminal history was limited to his “twenties” and that he had learned his lessons from prison and was proud he had not “institutionalized well”.  It would be redundant to repeat a print of his extensive criminal history here.  If you are NOT familiar, please visit here:

http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com/larry-la-rye-mohammed-vizcara-the-criminal/

We are not the only ones looking into Larry’s history as a lifelong con-artist:

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11164.html

Needless to say, Larry’s criminal history spans the entirety of his life and there are still multiple warrants out of his arrest and pending criminal trials.

So is it true that Larry revealed everything about his past?

NO WAY.  

 

The Money

Larry insist this is not about the money.  Though he has recently abandoned all attempts to “get his story out and further his cause”, fundraising is now and has always been in full swing.

And first and foremost, Larry’s entire “LAWSUIT” which to date has been a MISERABLE failure, is an attempt to sue three bloggers for “slander”.

It seems evident that as Larry hangs on to the vestige of support he has remaining, he is intent that these gullible, feeble-minded, bigots (and Hillary Clinton hang ons) be milked to help pay off his criminal debts and keep him from jail.  

He did this with a Florida warrant and continues to do it today.  For a complete list of Larry’s illegal collections, raffles and the fleecing of the feebs, please visit here:

http://themitchandnanshow.wordpress.com/larry-and-his-money/

So why is it SO apparent to us and others that while Larry claims “its not about money” it is ALL ABOUT MONEY?

BECAUSE HE LIES!  HE HAS ALL OF HIS LIFE AND HE IS NOW!

 

The Inconsistencies (Just a Smattering)

It would take more space than WordPress allows to document the HUNDREDS of lies and inconsistencies in Larry Sinclairs life.  All we focus on here are a few of our favorites….since he began his attack.

LIES AND INCONSISTENCIES

Larry’s lies and inconsistencies start at the beginning of his story.   Following are a list of the minor yet still significant falsehoods and fabrications.

• In his first YouTube video and earliest interviews, Larry claimed the event with Obama happened between November 3 and November 8.  Those dates have changed dramatically.
• Initially, Sinclair claimed the “limo” sex occurred one day and that two days later Senator Obama visited his hotel room.  Now he claims Obama’s visit was the next day.
• In the beginning, Sinclair claimed he had rented a limo from Five Star Limousine for many days prior to meeting Obama.  Now it was rented only one night before.
• Initially, Sinclair claimed to be attending the graduation of his nephew.  The story changed with Sinclair now claiming he was attending the graduation of his “god-son”. However, Sinclair would have been named “godfather” between the age of 12 and 16 if this were the case.  Unlikely.
• Originally, Sinclair claimed to have hotel receipts proving he indeed stayed in Gurnee, Il during the time in question.  He has yet to produce any actual receipts.
• Sinclair claimed to be in possession of “documentation proving” his claims after first being challenged on YouTube.  To date, NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER has EVER been produced in favor of Sinclair.
• After being visited by John Crewdson, Pulitzer Prize winning reporter, Sinclair claimed Crewdson had verified the “entire story but was unable to print it as his newspaper did not want to appear to be attacking a black candidate”.  John Crewdson has never been able to verify Sinclair’s story.
• At several points throughout his story, Sinclair has claimed to have requested “phone records” which Sprint/Nextel had assured him were available and were arriving soon. During his “press conference” just three weeks ago, Sinclair claimed he had only requested those records two weeks prior.  Now he claims the records are not available.
• Sinclair has recently claimed a “Detective McVickers” with the Chicago Police Department had a “Grand Jury” subpoena Sinclair’s phone records from Sprint/Nextel.  There is NO GRAND JURY currently considering the murder of Donald Young.
• Prior to the Polygraph by WhiteHouse.COM, Sinclair assured all he would pass with flying colors and expressed total faith in the polygraph theory.  However, prior to the results being published, Larry negotiated a much lower fee from WhiteHouse.COM- knowing full well he would not get the $100,000 promised had he passed.
• Early in the process, Larry had claimed he had revealed his “entire” criminal history. Obviously, the information we have produced here clearly contradicts every claim Larry has made about his law-breaking activities.
• Larry misidentifies his own photos, claiming that a photo obviously taken between the ages of 19 and 23 was his actual appearance when meeting Senator Obama in 1999. Indeed, the Colorado warrant photo was taken in 1999 and does not remotely resemble the photo Larry presents.
• Larry claims to “not be in this for the money” though he continues to collect funds at every possible juncture.  He has sued three innocent bloggers for $3M.  He threatened to sue a tabloid for the “illegal use” of his photo and collected $500.  He made $20,000 in his disastrous relationship with Dan Parisi and Whitehouse.COM.  He began an illegal “raffle” on the internet, turning it into a “nut-bread sale” when he learned of the legal problems.  This has been about MONEY for Larry Sinclair since the beginning. He is a serial, lifelong con artist, and this is his biggest con yet. Now he is taking money from poor people living on disability checks!
• Larry has claimed on numerous occasions that his “criminal behavior” was limited to his twenties.  There is no sense in elaborating further on this issue, but to restate that there is an outstanding warrant for arrest on Colorado and he is now facing felony charges on a recent con in Delaware — and he is raising money from his followers to defend these charges.
• Early in all of his claims, he states that Barack Obama visited his hotel in the “early evening” on the “second day” for round two of their sex and drug escapades.  However, at his recent “Press Conference”, he said he could not state the time of day of Obama’s second visit.
• Sinclair claimed all along to have changed his “cell phone” number between Labor Day Weekend, 1999 to October 1999.  However, one of the numbers he presented at the Press Conference was clearly a land-line phone number.

Why so many obvious and unexplained inconsistencies in this story?

     

HE IS LYING!

 

So what does all of this mean?  Why do we continue and what exactly is Sinclair trying to do now?

It means what we have said from the beginning.  Larry Sinclair is a fraud and a sham.  He NEVER met Barack Obama and while he may have indeed had indiscriminate sex that weekend (somewhere on earth probably Colorado, where he was on parole) there is not even any verifiable proof he was in Gurnee, Illinois that weekend or any other weekend.

He may have rented a limo at some point, but there is NO DRIVER who will EVER corroborate his lies.

He continues to rake in THOUSANDS of DOLLARS as he continues his leeching lifestyle by collecting every dime he possibly can milk from the US Government- always believing he is entitled and that he does not have to earn he own way.

He continues now to lead a small band of truly ignorant people and fleecing them of their government assistance and minimum wage lives as so many of them are hanging on to the reemergence of Hillary Clinton or are scared to death to have a “Black Muslim” take over the government.

For us?  We will continue to be a proverbial thorn in the side of Larry, Moma, Sibley and whoever else serves to perpetuate this fraud and his life.  We will continue to annoy them by contacting District Attorneys, Lawyers, Reporters, family, friends, neighbors, the SSA, whoever we can possibly contact to see this “man” imprisoned” or denied his right to live off of innocent taxpayers.

It was our focus in the beginning.  It remains our focus now.