Victor porte le coup de grace; Lard-Phuc se meurt

 

 

I am much ready to sleep and it is easier to write in French.  However, so begin the final dance of Larry Sinclair as we unfold his lies for the last time.  

A travers de recents posts sur d’autres blogs, Victor (dont l’intelligence et le savoir en matiere de droit n’est semble t’il plus a prouver) vient de porter le coup de grace definitif aux elucubrations mensongeres de Larry, ce dernier perdant ainsi toute credibilite.

Quand Larry clame avec sensationnalisme et ridicule que le Senateur Obama, Axelrod et leur equipe de campagne sont directement implique dans le meurtre de Donald Young, personne n’est dupe d’une telle absurdite.

Il y a peu, Larry persistait encore. Il assurait a qui voulait bien entendre qu’il fut en contact avec Young avant son assassinat. Affirmant qu’Obama avait ORDONNE, ARRANGE, et aurait meme ete l’AUTEUR du meurtre de Donald Young. Allant meme jusqu’a insinuer que Michelle Obama feindrait de voir le MEURTRE et les ECARTS de son mari.

Insistant encore; Donald Young aurait eu une relation intime avec le senateur Obama.

Les premieres gribouilles de Larry concernant le CPD (la police de Chicago) parlent d’elles meme:

It will be up to the Chicago Police Department under the guidance of Jody Weis (above) to determine if the person contacting me was Donald Young and if the numbers the contact came from were numbers associated with Barack Obama.

Ici, la patee qu’il sert a ces toutou dans l’unique but de les exiter:

Their is NO DOUBT in my mind that Barack Obama and Donald Young were intimately involved with one another.

Des elucubrations plus audacieuses encore:

 

Would anyone care to bet that the Axelrod/Obama/Wright phone records will disclose some very interesting links to a man they claim (through surrogates) they have never known?

Nous observons que dans cet extrait, Larry s’eloigne de ses precedentes declarations a propos de ses fameux contacts avec Donald Young. Cela parrait evident qu’il n’avait aucune idee de l’identitee de son interlocuteur.

Cela va sans dire; Victor est incontestablement l’un des plus ardent suppotaires de Larry ! Meme si recemment Victor s’interrogeait sur d’autre blog a propos du soudain retournement de personnalitee de Larry; lui faisant perdre toute credibilitee. Recemment il ecrivait :

I believe that the serious inconsistiencies in LS story, especially with respect to Donald Young, should be a caution to everyone.

Voici une preuve supplementaire, si tente qu’elle soit necessaire,  qu’il ne pourra nier:

In his latest interview with Jeff Rense a couple of weeks ago, LS said that the man who called and sent text messages to him on his four mobile numbers between September and early December 2007 told him explicitly that he got his information about LS directly from BO. He also discussed with LS that BO intended to make a statement about his drug use to comply with LS request, and then that he changed his mind about it.

Therefore, LS knew in that time period that the man was a confidant of Obama and was communicating with LS to discuss the allegations LS had made to Obama and his Campaign, as well as the additional matter of the alleged sexual conduct, which LS claims he had not mentioned to anyone.

The problem with that – and it is much more than a logical problem – is that LS has said innumerable times – that the reason he went public with his allegations is that nobody from Obama or his Campaign had acknowledged or responded to his request that Obama make a statement about his drug use in 1999.

He said that to journalists whom he approached privately in December 2007 and January 2008, he said it on his UTube videos, on his My Space page and many times on his blog, as well as in numerous radio and media interviews.

I, for one took that as fundamental justification of his public campaign.

Why did I and others not notice the clear contradiction? First of all because LS never mentioned until March 2008 that he had received calls or text messages from anyone.

And when he did mention it was after several people on his blog had asked him if he knew about the murder of Donald Young. It was only then that he announced as a “bombshell”, which he had been saving for the Jeff Rense show, that he had been in contact with the murdered Donald Young between September 2007 and early December 2008 (and not up to one day before his death on 24th December, 2007 as some are now alleging).

In order to explain why he had not mentioned it before, he said that a man had called him between September-December 2007 whose name was “Mr. Young” but he had not made the connection with Donald Young because he did not know who Donald Young was until he heard of his murder in March 2008.

The problem with that explanation is he did not need to know about the murder to have explained to everyone that a man had called whose name was Mr. Young who claimed to be a confidant of Obama and who had discussed a settlement of LS claims. He said that nobody had called, let alone a Mr. Young who told him he was getting his information about LS from BO.

In some later posts he said the reason he would not give more detail about his alleged contact with Donald Young was that it was the subject of a homicide investigation. But until March 2008 he did not know that a Donald Young had been murdered. So this does not adequately explain why he had not previously mentioned his contact with the so-called Mr. Young.

After he told us in March 2008 about his contact with Donald Young he continued to say that he had not received a response from Obama or the Campaign. But there was a difficulty for him with this.

How could he claim to have been in contact with Donald Young or Mr. Young and at the same time say he had no response? How did this Mr. Young aka as Donald Young know about LS?

Rather than answer that question, LS posted a rhetorical question of his own in a major post on his blog. He asked how Mr. Young aka Donald Young knew about his telephone numbers and the alleged sexual conduct. He implied he, LS, did not know for sure, and invited the public to speculate that it was because Mr. Young aka Donald Young got the information from the Campaign.

But this is inconsistent with what he said in his latest Rense interview. Because he said that he knew from his conversations with Mr. Young in September-December 2007 that Mr. Young got his information from BO.

So if he knew that why did he ask the question? Why did he not tell us at the time he asked the question?

These are the main inconsistencies in his changing story. But there are others.

Alors meme que son plus devoue soutien s’effondre, les accusations de Larry resonnent desesperement comme son dernier sursaut de fiertee. Demain nous porterons le coup de grace final, il va sans dire que la fin de son histoire sera fracassante.

Au revoir,

M&N