Lar-Tard and Victor Break Up Over Driver
May 8, 2008
…….Larry’s Mom
CAT FIGHT!
You read it here first folks. Victor wrote something Larry didn’t like about the driver. I believe it to be this post found on BHDC:
Victor said:
Larry offered to name the driver if he was given a national slot in which he could confront Obama and Axelrod.
He did not offer to have the driver with him on the show as I read his post (unless he has subsequently edited it).
No TV producer could arrange a confrontation between Larry and and Obama and Axelrod.
So the offer would have to be changed if it were to be meaningful.
Producers would be interested in knowing who the driver is.
They would be more interested in interviewing him.
Assuming he provided the ammunition they could then confront Obama and Axelrod directly or indirectly.
There are many ways the driver’s identity could be protected.
If the driver did not want to come forward the attorney could take a sworn deposition from him and then release it to the media omitting identifying details.
Apparently, Victor had posted this on Lar-Tards blog….and Lar-Tard edited it down to nothing:
Victor Says:
Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 10:38 pm
Larry, my statement simply repeated the offer you have in your post. I said your offer had to be changed if it was to be meaningful. I suggested ways it could be used to develop a situation in which the driver is introduced.
You truncated my post. It had about five or six parapgraphs. You reduced it to a phrase. That’s unacceptable to me.
Now these two bitches are at it again and THIS time it looks for real. ”Friends” of Victors tell the ENQUEER…”Victor has had it. He gives and gives and gets little from Larry. Larry had this like delicious looking candied apple the other day and Victor asked for a lick! Larry was like…”no Victor…come up with your own internet story and you can get your OWN candied apple”. Victor was hurt.
Victor’s car was seen careening down Sunset Blvd. in downtown Duluth and spectators said it looked like he was ready for a night out without “THE BOY”.
UPDATE
We found what Larry had said to Victor that hurt him so and it is N-A-S-T-Y……BITCHY! Check this out:
Victor Says:
Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 10:11 pmLarry’s offer is he will name the driverVictor, please do not state what “Larrys” offer is. You may state that is how you see it, but please do not state it as if you know what I am saying. I am not being disrespectful to you, but there is a line that must be drawn in you making statements as to what I am sayig. I will tell you that part of your comment is not correct at all. I just cannot tell you which part. I am removing the comment for that purpose.
NO WONDER THE POOR BOY IS SO HURT!
Latest rumors say Victor was last seen in a piss-colored yellow Cadillac with bald tires and one spinner heading toward CHICAGO!!!! We can only guess as to whose arms he is headed tonight!
Watch out GIRLS…..this ones just now getting hot!
THE DRAMA CONTINUES!
OK GIRLFRIENDS….Now…Victor has made it official by writing a “real” break up letter. Here’s the dish:
Victor Says:
Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 11:13 pmLarryI have published my comment on Big Head People can read it for themselves.
I should think it is obvious to everyone who reads this blog that I try to stay within the limited facts you have published.
The historical record is incomplete for all the reasons you have stated. Perhaps that’s the way it must be. But its not enough for me. I wrote to you the day before yesterday and again yesterday with questions to try to understand the meanings of your various statements about the drivers identity and other matters. I wanted to be sure I understood what you have said and what your intentions are.
I think this is twice you have made similar remarkrs about my presenting my views as though they were yours. I think that’s enough.
I have enjoyed blogging with all your supporters who have taught me a lot and changed some of my views.
I wish you well.
Now back to the work I have been neglecting.
OMG…THIS TIME I THINK IT’S FOR REAL!
Nurse Racket and some of the other girls in the clique are already asking Larry to contact Victor in private and work this out…but we all know Lard-Ass’ famous hard-headedness! (GET IT?)
I’m afraid this romance is headed to SPLITSVILLE and WE believe the race is on to see WHO will seek solace FIRST…in the arms of Barack.
Don’t worry girls…we’ve got our ears to the ground and we will bring you EVERYTHING on the NEXT….OUTSIDE ADDITION!
CIAO!
UPDATE
Word is in from that Duluth Hotspot the Circle J……. that Larry was seen totally out of control. Bystanders say they heard him mumbling about Victor not being a “decent” provider and not spending anytime at all with Larry’s mom!One sharp shopper caught this photo of Larry on a cell phone:
Obviously, Larry looks BAD! He can’t continue this out of control living much longer, sources say.
FURIOUS at the lack of privacy and the hounding by the Duluth society editor, it was reported that Larry hopped his hog and tore out at a dangerous speed. He is TOTALLY a TRANNY TRAINWRECK!
We will bring you more as events transpire!
CIAO!
May 8, 2008 at 5:19 am
Cat Fight !!!!
May 8, 2008 at 5:26 am
The core problem with these two love-birds…..VICTOR BELIEVES THERE’S A DRIVER!!!!
M
May 8, 2008 at 5:27 am
and it gets worse:
Victor Says:
Wednesday, May 7, 2008 at 11:13 pm
Larry
I have published my comment on Big Head People can read it for themselves.
I should think it is obvious to everyone who reads this blog that I try to stay within the limited facts you have published.
The historical record is incomplete for all the reasons you have stated. Perhaps that’s the way it must be. But its not enough for me. I wrote to you the day before yesterday and again yesterday with questions to try to understand the meanings of your various statements about the drivers identity and other matters. I wanted to be sure I understood what you have said and what your intentions are.
I think this is twice you have made similar remarkrs about my presenting my views as though they were yours. I think that’s enough.
I have enjoyed blogging with all your supporters who have taught me a lot and changed some of my views.
I wish you well.
Now back to the work I have been neglecting.
May 8, 2008 at 6:03 am
I thought it was George who was supposed to shoot Lennie in the back of the head, not the other way around.
May 8, 2008 at 6:20 am
They are dropping like flies…….
533. Anonymous said:
For the real Larry Sinclair -
Larry this is getting silly. There is no way Obama and Axelrod are going on national tv with you and the limo driver to refute what you and he has to say. That just isn’t going to happen.
I don’t really understand you. I believe that you are telling the truth. I believe you. But what I don’t understand is, if you have the limo drivers name and he is willing to speak why don’t you release all this info to someone like Matt Drudge? He broke the Monica Lewinsky story with Bill Clinton. I used to listen to Matt Drudge’s radio show. He is a staunch conservative and would publish your story in a heartbeat. So would Sean Hannity. Why don’t you send them the info or even meet with them. Sean, I’m sure would put you and your lawyer, Mr. Sibley and the limo driver on his show “Hannity and Colmes”.
Someone else mentioned that you could do a new youtube video with Mr. Sibley and the limo driver. Then the MSM could show that video every half hour for months to come. This would be the biggest story ever. Bigger than the Monica story.
I don’t understand why you won’t do this. Larry we don’t have that much time left. I have heard that the superdelegates will make up their mind by the middle of June. And it looks like they are leaning towards Obama. We can’t let this happen.
For the sake of our country Larry, please please please release the information so we can deny Obama the wannabe dictator from destroying America. If he takes office, it might mean the end of the world as we know it.
I do not know what you are waiting for. I cannot figure it out. But I believe you Larry, so be the hero I know you can be and do the right thing. This will be hard for you but you can save our nation.
Let the Truth Prevail Larry! Please do the right thing and put an end to Obama. I know you can!
May 8, 2008 at 8:26 am
I think the race is on to see who loses supporters faster – Sinclair or Clinton. Bets anyone?
In other news, in a weird 6 degrees of separation experience today I was talking to a chap who had spent a number of years living in Hawaii and I mentioned I had been following the Primaries and thought Obama should win and he said he used to date Obama’s sister. It’s a small world after all.
May 8, 2008 at 9:28 am
And Mitch – did I tell ya or what that Victor is leaving Larry for me? It was the post about breasts that did it. I’m such a naughty internet warrior autistic witch
Come hither Victor – that nasty Larry has been so horrible to you:
http://www.dsfanboy.com/media/2007/07/pc-bwt-1b-dsf.jpg
May 8, 2008 at 9:31 am
Post from Nurse Ratchet to Victor:
NURSERATCHET Says:
Thursday, May 8, 2008 at 3:10 am
OK, HERE IS THE NURSE’S TWO AND A HALF CENTS. LARRY, I DON’T THINK YOU ARE WRONG. AS I SAID BEFORE, IT’S YOUR SHIP AND A SHIP HAS ONE CAPTAIN. I READ VICTOR’S E-MAIL TO YOU AND AS MUCH AS I HAVE ADMIRED VICTOR’S INTELLECT AND USE OF LANGUAGE, I FOUND THE LETTER ACCUSATORY AND RUDE. WHY DOES VICTOR EVEN CARE ABOUT ANSWERING QUESTIONS FROM “JAY”. IN WHOSE WORLD DOES “JAY” COUNT?
May 8, 2008 at 9:42 am
Email from Victor to Larry:
From: Victor
Sent: Thu 5/08/08 1:04 AM
To: Lawrence Sinclair (lws022737@hotmail.com)
You did get at least one of my emails because you replied to one small part of it but not the main questions I asked.
There were two other emails about the apparent incompleteness or inconsistencies in your account of your contacts with the Obama campaing, Mr. Young and DJ.
I explained to you that I was holding back from replying to Jay in the Kangaroo Court on that issue because I think she was making some points that several people who support you were writing to me about. They also thought the points were valid unless there was further explanton from you. I said I could fashion a response to Jay but it would not satisfy everyone. Furthemore it would be my reply and not yours and people would be more interested in yours.
When I did not get a response from you I wrote again and said that if you did not reply I would go ahead and give my own interpretation.
However I have changed my mind. It is difficult enough staying within the limited facts you gave and trying to rationalise the apparent gaps and/or inconsistences, but its impossible if I have to worry about you publicly saying that I am misrepresenting you.
I think you say many things on your blog and on other blogs that should cause Sibley concern. I think you have given the opposition many pegs on which to hang objections and exhibits. And while their responses have given you a lot of work and bother and occpied your loyal helpers, the fact is that Sibley is the one at financial risk. He may never be paid for all the time he is spending trying to plug all the holes you are making. But that’s his business.
I think your supporters have done wonderfully well with very little facts. I think you should have developed more facts by now, but most of your energy has been directed against bloggers.
Your critics say that you turn nasty if anyone asks pointed questions. I have tried not to ask too many – in fact I have asked none directly until my last two emails. I have been widely criticised for following you slavishly. People who say that do not know me and I know they were trying to egg me on to criticise you. That is one of the reasons I never did criticse you. And what does it matter what they think?
The results of my questions seem to be as predicted by your critics. Given that you did not respond to my emails – except for the brief response to part of one of them – and the next thing I hear from you is a public comment that misrepresents and edits my post I have to wonder if there is a connection with my questions.
As I write this I received your second email with a link to Mitch and Nan. I won’t be opening it. Why should I pollute my mind and disturb my tranquiltiy with that rubbish.
One of the things that has dismayed me is the way you spend so much time and energy dealing with them. They have successfully deflected you from bringing your issue to the MSM. It seems at times that your main project is to fight them about your past. I can well understand that because you have put your real name out there those comments are hurtful and disturbing. But I advised you a long time ago the best way of dealing with them was to note them, not respond directly, wait a few days, collect your thoughts and respond in a factual , careful way to correct the record. Meanwhile you could send Sibley and statements by them that would be helpful to him.
You are tired and stressed but much of the cause of that arise from your fight with bloggers and responding to the way in which they have succesfully used your blog entries against you.
Its a bit rich to have you lecture me and suggest that someone it is I who am responsible for peoples impression of what you say and think.
Your challenge was meaningless. It appears to be another attempt to create false expectations.
If you have the driver and if he is prepared to be a witness I cannot understand why your lawyer has not found a way of protecing his identity while bringing his testimony out in the media.
I expect your reply would be that it is all in the lawyer-client sphere and we must not ask questions. Right. So there is not much point bloggin about it is there?
You should also consider that your style of writing often leaves things ambiguous or unclear or incomplete even if, in your mind, they are clear.
I am a small contributor to your defence fund, I offered you free accomodation here early in this situation when you were a bit concerned for your safety, I have spent scores of hours writing on your behalf. Your comments were plainly disrespectful. You were then patronising by making statements to the effect that I was wrong to take them personally.
I know you are stressed and so on but enough is enough.
May 8, 2008 at 9:44 am
Victor honey – it is as simple as this – I have backed Larry into a corner on a number of his inconsistencies. His response has primarily been avoidance, threats or diversion in my opinion. He doesn’t want you to do anything that would give those inconsistencies air time. Now why not? Maybe because they are actually problematic for him?
May 8, 2008 at 10:06 am
Damn but I have to give you the whole thing – Victor’s full email and Larry’s response:
larrysinclair0926 Says:
Thursday, May 8, 2008 at 2:24 am
I HAVE REMOVED VICTORS EMAIL ADDRESS FROM THE EMAIL EXCHANGE WE HAVE HAD. SINCE I AM LEAVING MY SUPPORTERS HANGING I SUGGEST YOU ASK VICTOR TO DECIDE HOW TO HANDLE THE INFORMATION HE NOW HAS.
THIS I NOT ABOUT BEING NASTY. VICTOR DECIDED TO TELL ME WHAT I HAVE TO DO BASED ON HIS NON STOP BACK AND FORTH WITH JAY, AND THE OTHERS ON BHDC. IF NYONE FEELS THE NEED TO GET ANSWERS FROM ME PLEASE EMAIL ME NOT VICTOR. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY HE WOULD TELL ME HE CAN BEST ANSWER FOR ME. BUT NOW HE CAN SAY WHATEVER HE PLEASES.
From: Victor
Sent: Thu 5/08/08 1:04 AM
To: Lawrence Sinclair (lws022737@hotmail.com)
You did get at least one of my emails because you replied to one small part of it but not the main questions I asked.
There were two other emails about the apparent incompleteness or inconsistencies in your account of your contacts with the Obama campaing, Mr. Young and DJ.
I explained to you that I was holding back from replying to Jay in the Kangaroo Court on that issue because I think she was making some points that several people who support you were writing to me about. They also thought the points were valid unless there was further explanton from you. I said I could fashion a response to Jay but it would not satisfy everyone. Furthemore it would be my reply and not yours and people would be more interested in yours.
When I did not get a response from you I wrote again and said that if you did not reply I would go ahead and give my own interpretation.
However I have changed my mind. It is difficult enough staying within the limited facts you gave and trying to rationalise the apparent gaps and/or inconsistences, but its impossible if I have to worry about you publicly saying that I am misrepresenting you.
I think you say many things on your blog and on other blogs that should cause Sibley concern. I think you have given the opposition many pegs on which to hang objections and exhibits. And while their responses have given you a lot of work and bother and occpied your loyal helpers, the fact is that Sibley is the one at financial risk. He may never be paid for all the time he is spending trying to plug all the holes you are making. But that’s his business.
I think your supporters have done wonderfully well with very little facts. I think you should have developed more facts by now, but most of your energy has been directed against bloggers.
Your critics say that you turn nasty if anyone asks pointed questions. I have tried not to ask too many – in fact I have asked none directly until my last two emails. I have been widely criticised for following you slavishly. People who say that do not know me and I know they were trying to egg me on to criticise you. That is one of the reasons I never did criticse you. And what does it matter what they think?
The results of my questions seem to be as predicted by your critics. Given that you did not respond to my emails – except for the brief response to part of one of them – and the next thing I hear from you is a public comment that misrepresents and edits my post I have to wonder if there is a connection with my questions.
As I write this I received your second email with a link to Mitch and Nan. I won’t be opening it. Why should I pollute my mind and disturb my tranquiltiy with that rubbish.
One of the things that has dismayed me is the way you spend so much time and energy dealing with them. They have successfully deflected you from bringing your issue to the MSM. It seems at times that your main project is to fight them about your past. I can well understand that because you have put your real name out there those comments are hurtful and disturbing. But I advised you a long time ago the best way of dealing with them was to note them, not respond directly, wait a few days, collect your thoughts and respond in a factual , careful way to correct the record. Meanwhile you could send Sibley and statements by them that would be helpful to him.
You are tired and stressed but much of the cause of that arise from your fight with bloggers and responding to the way in which they have succesfully used your blog entries against you.
Its a bit rich to have you lecture me and suggest that someone it is I who am responsible for peoples impression of what you say and think.
Your challenge was meaningless. It appears to be another attempt to create false expectations.
If you have the driver and if he is prepared to be a witness I cannot understand why your lawyer has not found a way of protecing his identity while bringing his testimony out in the media.
I expect your reply would be that it is all in the lawyer-client sphere and we must not ask questions. Right. So there is not much point bloggin about it is there?
You should also consider that your style of writing often leaves things ambiguous or unclear or incomplete even if, in your mind, they are clear.
I am a small contributor to your defence fund, I offered you free accomodation here early in this situation when you were a bit concerned for your safety, I have spent scores of hours writing on your behalf. Your comments were plainly disrespectful. You were then patronising by making statements to the effect that I was wrong to take them personally.
I know you are stressed and so on but enough is enough.
——————————————————————————–
From: lws022737@hotmail.com
To: Victor
Subject:
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 00:08:54 -0500
By now you should know that I have hardly ever edited or removed ones comments. I am under certain legal restrictions since my info was openly filed with the court by Levy. There are things I have been told by Sibley to do and I must do them.
I have not seen any of your questions about the driver. My only comments about the driver were that the Paramit(?) Multani that Mitch and Mike and others were claiming to be the driver, was not the driver and I made it clear because these idiots were attacking that mans wife and family.
Just as I stated today about Mitch posting every Multani he could find and info about them when in fact he was not nameing the correct person.
I emailed Crewdson last night and today and told him he would be responsible for anything that happened to the driver or drivers family if Mitch, DU.com or any of the others attacked.
My post was written intentionally to call Obama/Axelrod to a face off but was not conditioned on that. Nor did I want to state that becausethe media would have a basis for asking the campaign if they would appear.
Do not post this email anywhere. Please.
Thank you,
Larry Sinclair
**************************************************
Now, first point – Larry asks Victor not to ‘post this email anywhere’ – but then Larry goes and posts his email on his own blog – errrr ummmm duh!!!!!!
So what was the point of telling Victor not to post it anywhere then eh Larry? Douche!
Clearly Victor is identifying that both himself and a number of Larry’s supporters have been concerned about the inconsistencies I have raised because they are valid unless otherwise explained to satisfaction.
So Victor is calling Larry out on being avoidant – you need to explain these. But Victor – perhaps Larry CAN’T explain them. Then what conclusions does that lead you to eh?
I remember once someone saying that this case would be lost on the details. They were right. Larry makes an awful lot of continuous noise – but if you ignore that and work through things the inconsistencies are glaring and readily apparent.
What I find very intriguing about Larry’s responding email is that on the one hand he claims that we have totally the wrong people, but on the other hand he claims that ‘I emailed Crewdson last night and today and told him he would be responsible for anything that happened to the driver or drivers family if Mitch, DU.com or any of the others attacked.’
Now if we totally have the wrong people anyway Larry, how could we be attacking the driver or the drivers family? And further, if the people we have been discussing are not the Multani’s in question and therefore in no way attacking the driver or the drivers family – then why is Crewdson responsible for anything if he only said the word ‘Multani’ – which Larry had offered up himself on his YouTube commentary? Shouldn’t Larry be directly held responsible for any comments regarding any Multani’s as he was the first person who put that name into the public domain?
May 8, 2008 at 10:12 am
Just another example of Larry failing to take any sort of responsibility for himself. Just like failing the Polygraph – no responsibility there either: ‘Parisi was paid off’. Or minimizing his crimes, or when he does not have sufficient evidence it is an MSM conspiracy. Nothing is ever Larry’s fault is it?
I would tell you to freakin’ grow up Larry – but you are in your mid 40’s now and if you haven’t grown up by now you sadly never will.
May 8, 2008 at 10:38 am
Lol – sorry, I am enjoying this too much! I need those writer rights already! PMSL.
This whole thing is ongoing – you can read it all via the following link:
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/05/07/attn-foxcbscnnabcnbcmsnbc-i-will-disclose-drivers-name-on-live-nationwide-tv/#comments
All I can think of is this:
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/9/75653471_c0421dd3c6.jpg?v=0
May 8, 2008 at 12:07 pm
Jay you are awesome! When I grow up I wanna be JUST LIKE YOU!
May 8, 2008 at 12:12 pm
At this point, I just have to say “Bravo, Victor!” If he’s finally realizing how Larry operates, then maybe he’s not a complete idiot.
And maybe some of the others aren’t either. To (mis)quote Citizenwells, “Larry’s campaign is imploding.”
I love it!
May 8, 2008 at 12:35 pm
lol K Street
May 8, 2008 at 12:37 pm
I find THIS comment by Sinclair most ironic:
BamaLu Says:
Thursday, May 8, 2008 at 3:09 am
Larry, I thought you were leaving and turning over the store to Victor. What’s up?
—————————————————–
Sinclair replies:
“Vee, when Victor provides a wordpress account he can have it. But as I said earlier, not until I have removed all of my files from it. If you want Victor that bad email him. But I am sure you and he will try to use the driver info for your big story. You are the Geraldo friend right?
Man I cannot believe the lengths some people will go to to make a buck and walk on some one else back to get it. That is if you indeed are the Vee in Victors emails.”
May 8, 2008 at 12:39 pm
Wow…html works in comments! Cool. (I was able to bold the ironic comment Sinclair made.)
May 8, 2008 at 12:42 pm
Quick basic html lesson:
To bold a phrase or word: begin with this code (w/o quotation marks) “”
To end the bold use “”
To use italics: Begin “”
To end italics use: ““
May 8, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Ooops it didn’t take. The code did not show.
This link will explain better: http://www.webmonkey.com/webmonkey/reference/html_cheatsheet/
May 8, 2008 at 12:47 pm
Yep mt – I think that anyone who has heard or followed the Sinclair story – whether currently an opponent, supporter or simply no longer interested – would have at least listened to what Larry had to say. I really think the only thing that separates supporters, opponents and simply no longer interested groups is the point at which their bullshit detector is activated.
May 8, 2008 at 12:48 pm
Mitch and Nan, I think I should have asked you guys if the use of html is ok in comments BEFORE I posted the above. For that, I apologize.
May 8, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Just another Larry tanty K Street – is that the second time in like a week or so that he has threatened to stomp out of the sandpit? Never lasts long.
May 8, 2008 at 12:59 pm
WOW,
Larry’s problem is he wants people to take his word for everything. Victor, who I still think is a pompous windbag that writes a lot to say very little, I never thought was stupid. He apparently has been trying to have Larry’s back and give him the benefit of the doubt on a serious note. He’s also been one of the Larrys most “intelligent” supporters(many of them or complete “moroons”). But he too can see Larry’s blogging is damaging his case, how Larry’s reacts to those that have valid questions, and how stupid and futile this new Obama challenge is.
But lets remember folks. This also could be part of the con-job to throw off those trying to get to the bottom of Larry and disrupt his abuse and Scumbaggery™ of the legal system. We did suspect that Victor and Larry know each other or have had dealings with each other before this.
Word of Caution.
May 8, 2008 at 1:04 pm
Good point V.
May 8, 2008 at 1:11 pm
Jay what I meant is the following comment by Sinclair in reply to “BamaLu”:
“Man I cannot believe the lengths some people will go to to make a buck and walk on some one else back to get it. That is if you indeed are the Vee in Victors emails.”
How ironic is that??? He can’t believe the lengths people will go to…hahahaha what a joke. He’s talking about himself and doesn’t even know it.
May 8, 2008 at 1:24 pm
I suspect there is a lot of projection and transference in the things that Larry says. Larry is so quick to make claims – over at BHDC there is a post from Larry Sinclair saying that the person he gave the driver details to was probably going to peddle it for money. So he’s saying, basically, that Victor is going to peddle the info for his own pocket. Who knows if this is all some kind of ruse – but maybe Victor is experiencing what it is like to be cast in a false light by Larry, accused of doing things we have not nor intend to do. I would say plenty of us here know that feeling all too well.
May 8, 2008 at 1:37 pm
…” Larry we don’t have that much time left. I have heard that the superdelegates will make up their mind by the middle of June. And it looks like they are leaning towards Obama. We can’t let this happen.”
Damn Mr. Clinton does Hillary know your posting on blog again?
I think Larry and Hillary are on the same train Larry headed for a major de-rail while Hillary is a the level pushing it forward saying “full stream ahead”
Toot……………Toot!
I wonder if Victor will be in line now for a Larry lwa-suit?
I might contribute to that legal cat fight fund.
I would love to see Obama and Axelrod vs. King Papa Lartard in a “sword fight” on National T.V.
when and where Larry?
My only question will Larry be able to get it up?
Give the damn puppet a visa, and a time slot.
I’ll bring the popcorn and pepsi…
May 8, 2008 at 1:40 pm
oops “steam”
May 8, 2008 at 1:44 pm
Ladies and Gentlemen…
After reading and rereading all of this crap. I am convinced that this charade has been orchestrated for your enjoyment.
Don’t believe the hype people, this is a stage presentation of epic proportion. Victor and Larry have a little dance out in public and start calling eachother out. Not buying it…